Skip to main content

Psychosocial Work Environment – How to Work Actively and Systematically

Updated this week

The psychosocial work environment is an integral part of a company’s health, safety and environment (HSE) efforts. It concerns how work is organised, led and followed up in practice, and plays an important role in employee wellbeing, sustainable operations and regulatory compliance.

This article provides a practical overview of:

  • what is meant by the psychosocial work environment

  • the main legal requirements

  • how organisations can work actively and systematically with these topics in everyday operations

The intention is to show how this work can be a natural part of good management and governance, not something that is only addressed in special situations.

1. What is meant by the psychosocial work environment?

The psychosocial work environment includes aspects of work that affect employees’ mental health, motivation and experience of their working day.

Typical factors include:

  • workload and time pressure

  • roles, responsibilities and expectations

  • cooperation and communication

  • conflicts

  • leadership and follow-up

  • harassment, bullying and unwanted behaviour

  • violence and threats

These factors are shaped by how work is planned, distributed and managed, and are therefore a matter of leadership and organisation.

2. Legal requirements – the framework

Requirements related to the psychosocial work environment are primarily set out in the Norwegian Working Environment Act, as part of systematic HSE work.

In summary, the Act requires employers to:

  • ensure a fully satisfactory working environment

  • organise work so that employees are not exposed to adverse mental strain or harassment

  • work systematically and preventively with health, safety and the working environment

The legislation allows flexibility in how these requirements are met, but is clear about responsibility, structure and follow-up.

3. Systematic work with the psychosocial work environment

Good practice is characterised by addressing the psychosocial work environment proactively and continuously, rather than reactively.

This work can be divided into three main areas:

4. Risk assessments

Organisations should regularly carry out conscious assessments of risks related to psychosocial factors, in the same way as for physical working conditions.

Typical topics include:

  • workload and work pressure

  • roles, responsibilities and expectations

  • cooperation and interaction

  • conflict levels

  • leadership and follow-up

  • violence and threats

  • harassment and sexual harassment

The key is not the format, but that assessments are:

  • relevant to the organisation

  • documented at an appropriate level

  • used as a basis for preventive measures and improvements

5. Measures and procedures

Systematic work requires clear and practical procedures for handling situations that may arise.

Common examples include:

  • procedures for conflict management

  • procedures for handling harassment, bullying and unwanted behaviour

  • whistleblowing procedures

  • clear clarification of roles and responsibilities if an issue occurs

Procedures should be:

  • adapted to the size and risk profile of the organisation

  • easy to understand and apply

  • known and used in practice by both managers and employees

6. Follow-up in everyday operations

An essential part of psychosocial work environment management is ongoing follow-up over time.

In practice, this involves ensuring that:

  • managers are familiar with and use the procedures

  • employees know where to find them and how to use them

  • concerns are addressed at an early stage

  • cases are handled in a predictable and structured manner

When this works well in daily operations, the organisation is also well prepared if the work is later reviewed or questioned.

7. Participation and involvement

A good psychosocial work environment is created through cooperation.

This means that:

  • employees are involved in assessments and improvement efforts

  • safety representatives (and, where applicable, working environment committees) play an active role

  • dialogue and participation are a natural part of everyday work

This contributes to better measures and stronger ownership within the organisation.

8. An important clarification

The law does not require that everyone feels good all the time.

It requires that the employer:

  • works systematically

  • prevents known risk factors

  • takes action when challenges arise

When this is in place, the psychosocial work environment becomes part of normal operations, rather than something addressed only when problems occur.

9. How we recommend working with this in practice

Our experience is that work on the psychosocial work environment is most effective when it is integrated into existing structures and processes, rather than treated as a standalone project.

We recommend:

  • clearly anchoring responsibility in management, making the psychosocial work environment part of the leadership role

  • using existing meeting arenas (management meetings, staff meetings, working environment committees) for regular dialogue

  • carrying out simple, relevant risk assessments that are actively used as a basis for decisions

  • ensuring that procedures are practical, understandable and adapted to everyday operations

  • working preventively and addressing signals early, before challenges escalate

  • reviewing and adjusting measures when there are changes in organisation, staffing or workload

Small, systematic efforts over time often deliver better results than large, isolated initiatives. When this work is well integrated into daily operations, it supports both a healthy work environment and long-term sustainability.

Summary

Working with the psychosocial work environment is about good organisation, clear leadership and systematic HSE work.

Organisations that actively carry out risk assessments, establish clear procedures and follow up in practice create a strong foundation for employees, managers and the organisation as a whole.

Did this answer your question?